
When I was in 10th grade, I decided for a book report to tackle a strange looking novel I had found in my grandparents' basement years before. The book was
Animal Farm written by a man named Eric Blair, but under the pen name of George Orwell [I was thinking to myself a few minutes ago, if I had a pen name, what would it be? Didn't take me long to decide. Depending on what Gender I wanted the author to be perceived as, I would call myself either Katifa Ikjr, or Frederick Gurshner. No need for pen names as of yet, though...]
As a sophomore in high school, I thought
Animal Farm was the bee's knees. It didn't have a happy ending, but it moved me to the point of wanting to throw the book across the room in anger and frustration. I recognized that that was pretty powerful writing. [Unfortunately, when I trudged through Orwell's other famous novel
1984 for a Senior English project, I found I had a similar reaction but with no admiration for the writing. C.S. Lewis alluded to similar sentiments at one point, so I at least am not the only one.]
Fast forward another decade, and here I am having just finished reading through the book again. My friend Jeremy gave Josh and I a gift card to Amazon as a wedding gift, and this is one of the things we got with it.
The story is essentially a metaphor of how communism doesn't work, set in the context of animals who took over their farm.
In the beginning of the story, and incidentally The Revolution, two pigs emerge as leaders. Snowball is filled with idealism over the new philosophy that is referred to as Animalism. Napolean is a bit more low profile, but makes up for in cunning what he lacks in nobility.
When things are fresh and the animals begin their liberation, it seems like it might all work and be a beautiful thing. But as the story progresses it becomes painfully clear that absolute power does indeed corrupt absolutely.
I won't rehash the whole plot for you (really, it's a quick read at under 150 pages), but I will share one thought.
The character in the story I found myself identifying with (seemingly much more so these 12 or 13 years later) is a sturdy workhorse named Boxer. Boxer is none too intelligent (he can only remember about 8 letters of the alphabet), but he is super-dedicated. Because he's so big and strong, he almost singlehandedly pulls the farm through when multiple times it may have crashed due to impossibility. (ok, so I don't think I'm stupid or big and strong, just stay with me)
Anyway, Boxer lives his life (at least after the rebellion) by two maxims. One is,
"I will work harder." The other is,
"Comrade Napolean is always right."If there is a problem on the farm, Boxer's answer is to dig deeper, sacrifice more, etc.
If there is a controversy, he always submits to his leader...even at the sake of compromising his own memories.
In the end, Boxer wears himself out. Instead of enjoying the remainder of his years in retirement (as idealized in the beginning of the rebellion), he is sold for glue. His hard work and loyalty achieve only further exploitation.
I guess this isn't a very happy-thought entry, but it makes me wonder...how often do I miss the best solution to a problem by just trying to take more on myself? How often do I second guess myself by way of loyalty to someone who may not necessarily deserve it? And what's really bothersome to ponder...how much of my hard work and loyalty achieve things for an institution/movement/culture I don't really want to be advancing afterall?
Labels: books